Saputelli, James R. Carl W. This opinion is, hopefully, dare I say it, my "last L'eggs. As a result, I must now make findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to Sara Lee's Counterclaims pursuant to Rule 52 a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Trial Tr.
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery, 47 F. Supp. 2d 523 (D.N.J. 1999)
THE NEW SARA LEE: HOSIERY GIANT SENDS MESSAGE OF CHANGE Byline: Rose.. – WWD
Skip to main content. Listed in category:. Email to friends Share on Facebook - opens in a new window or tab Share on Twitter - opens in a new window or tab Share on Pinterest - opens in a new window or tab. Add to Watchlist. People who viewed this item also viewed. Showing Slide 1 of 1.
Every work experience is unique. Let people know your thoughts on previous employers. Indeed Home. Find jobs. Company reviews.
Many feel it points the way for an industry that has been suffering from sluggish interest in one of its major products, sheer pantyhose. It will sell such assets as textile plants and outsource some administrative functions to cut costs. However, it added, in announcing the program, that hosiery operations were also part of the new equation. Aware that Sara Lee has cited Nike as an example of a highly successful company that excels at marketing and owns no manufacturing facilities, some industry executives questioned how that winning formula could be translated to hosiery. Legwear lacks the emotional appeal of sports, they said.